C2D3


Workshops & Institutes:

Using Assessment to Transform Students into Learners
C2D3 Overview
Clarifying Learning
Data Driven Dialogue
Quality Assessment


Information Based Education Practice Standards:

The evolution of decision-support technologies and their rapid penetration of the K-12 educational marketplace have made it possible to bring educators a wide variety of data, in ever-expanding formats, to facilitate just-in-time, instructional decision-making. But even as these educational data and assessment technologies continue to improve, their use by educators and the potential transformation of instructional practice has lagged behind. Simply putting data and assessment technologies in the hands of educators has not been enough to change their practice (e.g., Ringstaff & Kelley, 2002; Dick, 2005).

Text Box: IBEP Standards for Classroom PracticeThis was the situation three and-a-half years ago when a consortium of districts, BOCES, and the University of Colorado at Denver responded to a Colorado Department of Education (CDE) request for proposals to implement Information-Based Educational Practice (IBEP) among the educators in districts across the state. The resulting project, the Colorado Consortium for Data-Driven Decisions (C2D3), focused on developing the practices among educators and educational decision-makers that would allow them to take advantage of the evolving marketplace of data and assessment technologies. To clarify what these practices include, the original project developed Information-Based Educational Practice (IBEP) Standards for Classroom Practice. These Standards formed the core around which the C2D3 project developed professional learning experiences for educators and educational leaders.

The original C2D3 project discovered that first and foremost educators needed to see what information-rich educational practice that takes full advantage of data technologies would look like. Next, they needed sustained professional learning experiences that developed their understanding of these practices and supported their efforts to transfer them into their daily routines. Finally, they needed these changed practices to be supported within their school and district context.  The original project made considerable progress on all of these fronts within participating districts, as evidenced by the C2D3 year 3 evaluation report. Many educators in those districts now use information-based practices, but not enough for these practices to permeate the state.


21st Century Standards-Based Educational Practices and Innovation Configuration Maps:

Like a road map that shows different ways of getting from one place to another, an innovation configuration map (ICM) identifies major components of an innovation and then describes the observable variations of each component. The 21st Century Standards-Based educational practices ICM  provides developed descriptors that define the different levels of operational forms for implementing 21st Century Standards-Based instruction at the classroom level. These maps can then be used in research, evaluation and assessments as well as in facilitating the change with planning, development and implementation.

The following ICM describes 21st Century Standards-Based educational practices from the educator perspective. For purposes of this map, educators include: in-service teachers, teacher candidates, and faculty members. This map includes four clusters of practices.  The clusters are:

1. Clearly define learning.
2. Use quality assessment instruments and practices to select, evaluate, and revise instruction.
3.Use classroom assessment formatively to support students taking responsibility for their own learning.
4. Use collaborative inquiry to analyze and interpret data.

Each practice cluster includes a number of components for educators and students, with descriptors for up to 5 variations for each component of the practice. The variation that is closest to the intent of the innovation is variation (a).

For Innovation Configuration Maps and IC mapping, see, Hall, Gene E. & Hord, Shirley M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Click here to download the ICM in a pdf


CDE Status Reports:


Evaluation Reports:

Quicklink to all Upcoming Events  SPOTLIGHT

Join our e-mail list to receive information about upcoming special events
and opportunities for teachers, instructional coaches, educational specialists, and administrators! 
To subscribe, send an email to
CTLT@ucdenver.edu with "Subscribe" in the subject line.
 

 

Julie O'Brian
Project Director
julie@ctlt.org

 

Mary Beth Romke
Change Coach
mary@ctlt.org

 

Lynda Aguado
 Student Assistant
lynda.aguado@ucdenver.edu